Prompt 1
Prompt 1
Prompt 2
Prompt 2
Prompt 3
Prompt 3
Prompt 4
Prompt 4
Prompt 5
Prompt 5
Prompt 6
Prompt 6
Prompt 7
Prompt 7
Prompt 8
Prompt 8
Prompt 9
Prompt 9
Prompt 10
Prompt 10
Prompt 11
Prompt 11
Prompt 12
Prompt 12
Prompt 13
Prompt 13
Prompt 14
Prompt 14
Prompt 15
Prompt 15
Prompt 16
Prompt 16
Prompt 17
Prompt 17
Prompt 18
Prompt 18
Prompt 19
Prompt 19
Prompt 20
Prompt 20
Prompt 21
Prompt 21
Prompt 22
Prompt 22
Prompt 23
Prompt 23
Prompt 24
Prompt 24
Prompt 25
Prompt 25
Prompt 26
Prompt 26
Prompt 27
Prompt 27
Prompt 28
Prompt 28
Prompt 29
Prompt 29
Prompt 30
Prompt 30
Prompt 31
Prompt 31
Prompt 32
Prompt 32
Prompt 33
Prompt 33
Prompt 34
Prompt 34
Prompt 35
Prompt 35
Prompt 36
Prompt 36
Prompt 37
Prompt 37
Prompt 38
Prompt 38
Prompt 39
Prompt 39
Prompt 40
Prompt 40
Prompt 41
Prompt 41
Prompt 42
Prompt 42
Prompt 43
Prompt 43
Prompt 44
Prompt 44
Prompt 45
Prompt 45
Prompt 46
Prompt 46
Prompt 47
Prompt 47
Prompt 48
Prompt 48
Prompt 49
Prompt 49
Prompt 50
Prompt 50
Prompt 51
Prompt 51
Prompt 52
Prompt 52
Prompt 53
Prompt 53
Prompt 54
Prompt 54
Prompt 55
Prompt 55
Prompt 56
Prompt 56
Prompt 57
Prompt 57
Prompt 58
Prompt 58
Prompt 59
Prompt 59
Prompt 60
Prompt 60
Prompt 61
Prompt 61
Prompt 62
Prompt 62
Prompt 63
Prompt 63
Prompt 64
Prompt 64
Prompt 65
Prompt 65
Prompt 66
Prompt 66
Prompt 67
Prompt 67
Prompt 68
Prompt 68
Prompt 69
Prompt 69
Prompt 70
Prompt 70
Prompt 71
Prompt 71
Prompt 72
Prompt 72
Prompt 73
Prompt 73
Prompt 74
Prompt 74
Prompt 75
Prompt 75
Prompt 76
Prompt 76
Prompt 77
Prompt 77
Prompt 78
Prompt 78
Prompt 79
Prompt 79
Prompt 80
Prompt 80
Prompt 81
Prompt 81
Prompt 82
Prompt 82
Prompt 83
Prompt 83
Prompt 84
Prompt 84
Prompt 85
Prompt 85
Prompt 86
Prompt 86
Prompt 87
Prompt 87
Prompt 88
Prompt 88
Prompt 89
Prompt 89
Prompt 90
Prompt 90
Prompt 91
Prompt 91
Prompt 92
Prompt 92
Prompt 93
Prompt 93
Prompt 94
Prompt 94
Prompt 95
Prompt 95
Prompt 96
Prompt 96
Prompt 97
Prompt 97
Prompt 98
Prompt 98
Prompt 99
Prompt 99
Prompt 100
Prompt 100
Prompt 101
Prompt 101
Prompt 102
Prompt 102
Prompt 103
Prompt 103
Prompt 104
Prompt 104
Prompt 105
Prompt 105
Prompt 106
Prompt 106
Prompt 107
Prompt 107
Prompt 108
Prompt 108
Prompt 109
Prompt 109
Prompt 110
Prompt 110
Prompt 111
Prompt 111
Prompt 112
Prompt 112
Prompt 113
Prompt 113
Prompt 114
Prompt 114
Prompt 115
Prompt 115
Read the below Information:
Some health experts and government advisors believe that all advertising for food and drinks that are high in sugar, salt, or fat should be banned during television programmes and online content that is primarily watched by children.
- • Do you agree or disagree with this view? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Words: 0
Important Keywords/Phrases
Sample Answer
15 keywordsChildhood obesity has become a significant public health challenge in many countries, and the role of junk food advertising in shaping children's dietary habits is well documented. I strongly agree that advertising for food products high in sugar, salt, or fat should be banned from children's media content, as the evidence for harm is compelling and the case for intervention is clear. The most persuasive reason for such a ban is that children are uniquely vulnerable to marketing influence. Unlike adults, young children lack the critical thinking skills to recognise advertising as a persuasive technique rather than a straightforward recommendation. Research consistently shows that repeated exposure to junk food advertising creates strong brand preferences and increases children's requests for unhealthy products, directly shaping their dietary habits at a formative stage. Countries that have introduced restrictions — including the United Kingdom, where junk food advertising before the 9 pm watershed has been limited — have seen measurable reductions in children's exposure to these promotions. Opponents of such bans often argue that parental responsibility should be the primary safeguard, and that government intervention restricts commercial freedom. While parental guidance is undeniably important, it places an unreasonable burden on families who are trying to instil healthy habits while competing against the enormous resources of the food industry's marketing budgets. Consumer protection legislation exists precisely because some influences are too powerful and too pervasive for individuals to resist alone — and children's media exposure to processed food advertising clearly meets that threshold. The long-term costs of childhood obesity — to individual health and to public healthcare systems — far outweigh any short-term commercial inconvenience. A ban on junk food advertising in children's media is a proportionate, evidence-based policy that governments should implement without further delay.