Ielts-writing-practiceielts-general-task2-essay-writing

PrevNext

Prompt 1

Prompt 1

Prompt 2

Prompt 2

Prompt 3

Prompt 3

Prompt 4

Prompt 4

Prompt 5

Prompt 5

Prompt 6

Prompt 6

Prompt 7

Prompt 7

Prompt 8

Prompt 8

Prompt 9

Prompt 9

Prompt 10

Prompt 10

Prompt 11

Prompt 11

Prompt 12

Prompt 12

Prompt 13

Prompt 13

Prompt 14

Prompt 14

Prompt 15

Prompt 15

Prompt 16

Prompt 16

Prompt 17

Prompt 17

Prompt 18

Prompt 18

Prompt 19

Prompt 19

Prompt 20

Prompt 20

Prompt 21

Prompt 21

Prompt 22

Prompt 22

Prompt 23

Prompt 23

Prompt 24

Prompt 24

Prompt 25

Prompt 25

Prompt 26

Prompt 26

Prompt 27

Prompt 27

Prompt 28

Prompt 28

Prompt 29

Prompt 29

Prompt 30

Prompt 30

Prompt 31

Prompt 31

Prompt 32

Prompt 32

Prompt 33

Prompt 33

Prompt 34

Prompt 34

Prompt 35

Prompt 35

Prompt 36

Prompt 36

Prompt 37

Prompt 37

Prompt 38

Prompt 38

Prompt 39

Prompt 39

Prompt 40

Prompt 40

Prompt 41

Prompt 41

Prompt 42

Prompt 42

Prompt 43

Prompt 43

Prompt 44

Prompt 44

Prompt 45

Prompt 45

Prompt 46

Prompt 46

Prompt 47

Prompt 47

Prompt 48

Prompt 48

Prompt 49

Prompt 49

Prompt 50

Prompt 50

Prompt 51

Prompt 51

Prompt 52

Prompt 52

Prompt 53

Prompt 53

Prompt 54

Prompt 54

Prompt 55

Prompt 55

Prompt 56

Prompt 56

Prompt 57

Prompt 57

Prompt 58

Prompt 58

Prompt 59

Prompt 59

Prompt 60

Prompt 60

Prompt 61

Prompt 61

Prompt 62

Prompt 62

Prompt 63

Prompt 63

Prompt 64

Prompt 64

Prompt 65

Prompt 65

Prompt 66

Prompt 66

Prompt 67

Prompt 67

Prompt 68

Prompt 68

Prompt 69

Prompt 69

Prompt 70

Prompt 70

Prompt 71

Prompt 71

Prompt 72

Prompt 72

Prompt 73

Prompt 73

Prompt 74

Prompt 74

Prompt 75

Prompt 75

Prompt 76

Prompt 76

Prompt 77

Prompt 77

Prompt 78

Prompt 78

Prompt 79

Prompt 79

Prompt 80

Prompt 80

Prompt 81

Prompt 81

Prompt 82

Prompt 82

Prompt 83

Prompt 83

Prompt 84

Prompt 84

Prompt 85

Prompt 85

Prompt 86

Prompt 86

Prompt 87

Prompt 87

Prompt 88

Prompt 88

Prompt 89

Prompt 89

Prompt 90

Prompt 90

Prompt 91

Prompt 91

Prompt 92

Prompt 92

Prompt 93

Prompt 93

Prompt 94

Prompt 94

Prompt 95

Prompt 95

Prompt 96

Prompt 96

Prompt 97

Prompt 97

Prompt 98

Prompt 98

Prompt 99

Prompt 99

Prompt 100

Prompt 100

Prompt 101

Prompt 101

Prompt 102

Prompt 102

Prompt 103

Prompt 103

Prompt 104

Prompt 104

Prompt 105

Prompt 105

Prompt 106

Prompt 106

Prompt 107

Prompt 107

Prompt 108

Prompt 108

Prompt 109

Prompt 109

Prompt 110

Prompt 110

Prompt 111

Prompt 111

Prompt 112

Prompt 112

Prompt 113

Prompt 113

Prompt 114

Prompt 114

Prompt 115

Prompt 115

Read the below Information:

Some urban planners and environmental advocates argue that local governments should introduce strict policies to limit the number of private cars that residents are allowed to own, in order to reduce traffic congestion and air pollution in cities.


  • • Do you agree or disagree with this view? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Time remaining: 40 minutes 0 seconds

Words: 0

Important Keywords/Phrases

car ownershiptraffic congestionair pollutionurban mobilitypublic transportpersonal freedomgovernment regulationcity planningvehicle restrictionemissionalternative transportcycling infrastructureenvironmental policyurban healthcommuter

Sample Answer

15 keywords

Traffic congestion and air pollution remain among the most damaging features of modern urban life, and the private car is a leading contributor to both. I agree that governments should introduce policies to limit car ownership in cities, provided those policies are implemented alongside serious investment in alternative transport options. The case for restriction is grounded in straightforward urban reality. Roads in most large cities were designed for a fraction of the vehicles now using them, and the resulting congestion costs economies billions each year in lost productivity, delayed freight, and fuel waste. More seriously, vehicle emissions are a primary driver of the poor air quality that causes respiratory illness and premature death in dense urban populations. Cities such as Singapore and Amsterdam have demonstrated through rigorous urban planning that restricting private car access — through ownership quotas, congestion charges, or stringent parking limits — substantially reduces both traffic volume and emission levels, with measurable improvements in urban health outcomes. Critics of such policies argue that limiting car ownership infringes on personal freedom and disproportionately affects residents who depend on vehicles for work or family care. This concern is legitimate, but it is most valid where public transport alternatives are inadequate. The appropriate policy response is not to abandon restriction, but to ensure that cycling infrastructure, affordable buses, reliable urban rail, and accessible taxi services are developed simultaneously, so that car ownership becomes genuinely less necessary rather than simply less affordable. When restrictions are paired with credible alternatives, the burden on car-dependent residents is manageable. In conclusion, limiting private car ownership in cities is a justified and necessary policy response to urban congestion and pollution. Its success depends entirely on whether governments are willing to invest in the transport alternatives that make it workable for all residents.